24 Nov 2010Bad news for rural Britain as digital divide deepens
This analysis is taken from Point Topic's Broadband User Service.
Providing a detailed view of the current and future progress of
broadband in the UK the service is essential for anyone with an
interest of the state of the market and its future.
Plans to make Britain’s broadband the best in Europe are in
danger of stalling as the rural population of the UK falls further
behind their city
cousins.
This was the warning given today by Chief Analyst Tim Johnson of Point
Topic, the world’s leading source on fixed broadband, who was
speaking at the
NextGen10 conference in Birmingham.
“Our analysis of the rural-urban digital divide doesn’t
paint a rosy picture,” said Mr Johnson. Broadband speeds and
costs are very sensitive to
distance and population density he points out. “The higher speeds
which people will expect and need in future will simply not be
available in the
countryside unless radical action is taken,” he declared.
Point Topic has used its database of the broadband geography of the UK
to calculate the percentage coverage of six different measures of
broadband
infrastructure*, area by area. Rural areas are well behind urban ones
on every one of them (see graphic). The six indicators can be combined
to
provide a single Broadband Infrastructure Index (BII). The urban areas
of Britain scored 67% on this index as of mid-2010, the rural areas
only 25%.
Figure 1: Broadband Infrastructure Index

As far as end-users are concerned, both residential and business,
the perceived gap will only get wider over the next few years as
demands and
expectations for higher speeds grow steadily, doubling every two years
according to many estimates. When 4Mbps becomes the minimum for good
broadband
as against 2Mbps today, the countryside will be even worse off because
speed falls off so rapidly with longer distance.
Nor will there be much public money to bridge the gap in current
circumstances. But Mr Johnson believes there is still a lot that both
local
communities and national government can do to bring lasting
fit-for-purpose superfast broadband services to rural areas.
One thing which communities – from Government Regions down to
villages - can do to get superfast broadband funded is to be very
creative about the
business plan Mr Johnson believes. He said: “Rural superfast
broadband is going to bring huge benefits with it for many different
parties. Local
projects need to find ways of leveraging those benefits to finance the
network, whether it’s by getting money off property developers or
contributions
for the environmental benefits.”
But none of this can happen unless the government also takes a much
more radical approach than it has shown so far. “There are too
many questions left
unanswered,” added Mr Johnson. “How can a small operator
deploy a network when there is a real concern they’ll be gazumped
by a BT or Virgin
deployment as yet unannounced? How can small operators afford to pay
extortionate rates on any fibre they do install and still make the
numbers add
up? How can the county councils or the local economic partnerships get
any funding or sign any partners without adequate information?”
“The Coalition has got to address these issues urgently if it
wants to get a good broadband infrastructure in Britain,” Mr
Johnson concluded. “Hopefully the broadband strategy paper to be
published in December will make a start. But their retreat from
tackling the grossly unfair fibre tax
has been bitterly disappointing already. They’ve got a lot of
ground to make up if they really want ‘the best broadband in
Europe’ by the time of the
next election.”
*Each of the six indicators measures the availability of a different
feature of broadband infrastructure; local-loop unbundling (LLU)
services, from
ISPs such as TalkTalk or Sky, BT telephone exchanges enabled for its
21st Century Network (21CN), the Virgin Media cable network, broadband
services
of at least 2Mbps downstream, next-generation access (NGA) superfast
broadband services as of end-2010, and projected NGA services for
end-2015.